top of page

 

Artifacts

"Problem analysis involves determining the nature and parameters of the problem by using information-gathering and decision-making strategies" (Seels & Richey, 1994, p. 56). ECIT candidates exhibit technology competencies defined in the knowledge base. Candidates collect, analyze, and interpret data to modify and improve instruction and ECIT projects.

5.1 Problem Analysis:

"Evaluation is the process of determining the adequacy of instruction and learning" (Seels & Richey, 1994, p. 54).  I define evaluation as finding out if your work actually accomplished what it was created to do.The domain of evaluation includes four subdomains: Problem Analysis, Criterion-Referenced Measurement, Formative and Summative Evaluation, and Long-Range Planning.

 

Reflection

The evaluation stage in the early days of my career is something that didn’t happen most of the time. Now that I know how to properly evaluate a program or course, I would love to go back and do it for some of my past work. A lot of the government contract work I did didn’t ever have it in the plan or budget to do an evaluation of the work. The client was usually just concerned with getting the training or product complete by any means necessary. Most of the time, I didn’t even know if the training was successful or not. At the most, at the end of a classroom training class we would hand out a survey. Again, now that I know how to write a more effective survey, I would go back and change some of the questions I asked. Prior to beginning this program I didn’t have a lot of knowledge about doing evaluations and the value in doing them.

 

The evaluation phase is something I have a completely different view of now thanks to my experience in this program. Evaluating the effectiveness of a course/program is something I plan to do a lot more going forward. It is information that is critical to my success at my job. I need to know if the programs or the training courses I am creating are doing what they were designed to do. I just can’t assume that they’re because that is what they are intended to do. As a part of one of my classes, I performed a program evaluation of our New Employee Development Program at work. The results I obtained thanks to the skills I learned in the class have helped us restructure the program to make it more effective. The feedback we received from users also reinforced why we do some of the things as a part of the program. Doing an evaluation of the program identified areas that students of the program overall didn’t enjoy or gain anything from. It also helped us realize that parts of the program that we didn’t have as much control over, needed us to step in and take a bigger management role over to ensure effectiveness. If this evaluation wasn’t done, the program would have kept doing the same thing every year with the assumption that everything was fine. A lot of things were fine in the first place. Some critical areas of the program needed to be changed however. Since I didn’t really perform evaluations in past practices, I would say my current practices have significantly improved. This has given me the ability to improve upon my work going forward. 

 

In the future, I think I will use my evaluation knowledge the most to improve training programs. I want to continuously track and review so that I am always improving the user’s experience. I no longer want to look at creating training as a “one and done” thing. 

AECT Standard 5: Evaluation

  • Software Evaluation Criterion (word document) This document details the criterion we ultimatly used to decide whether or not to implement the LMS. 

 

 

 

Artifacts

"Criterion-referenced measurement involves techniques for determining learner mastery of pre-specified content" (Seels & Richey, 1994, p. 56). ECIT candidates utilize criterion-referenced performance indicators in the assessment of instruction and ECIT projects..

5.2 Criterion-Referenced Measurement:

 

 

 

Artifacts

"Formative evaluation involves gathering information on adequacy and using this information as a basis for further development. Summative evaluation involves gathering information on adequacy and using this information to make decisions about utilization" (Seels & Richey, 1994, p. 57). ECIT candidates integrate formative and summative evaluation strategies and analyses into the development and modification of instruction, ECIT projects, and ECITprograms.

5.3 Formative and Summative Evalution:

  • Project and Report (Knowledge Harvesting) (word document) Demonstrates my ability to make a plan for the business to continue long term success by harvesting the knowledge of employees so that it is not lost.

 

 

 

Artifacts

Long-range planning that focuses on the organization as a whole is strategic planning....Long-range is usually defined as a future period of about three to five years or longer. During strategic planning, managers are trying to decide in the present what must be done to ensure organizational success in the future." (Certo, et al, 1990, p. 168). ECIT candidates demonstrate formal efforts to address the future of this highly dynamic field including the systematic review and implementation of current ECIT developments and innovations.

5.4 Long-Range Planning:

References 

Seels, B.B., & Richey, R.C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. 

Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

bottom of page